Eating Jesus' Flesh and drinking His Blood Research Paper

Eating the Nazarene var. and drinking His Blood - Research Paper ExampleThe Hebrew writer tells us that His blood was sick for the transgressions of those who lived under the depression testament, as well as those who live under the second (Heb. 915). So, on the whole humanity, who desire salvation, are dependent upon the blood of Christ In this lesson, we shall list some of the things that are verbalize to be accomplished by the blood of Christ. rhythmS 51-52 I AM THE LIVING BREAD 51I am the sustainment bread which came down out of heaven. If anyone wastes (Greek phage) of this bread, he willing live eternally. Yes, the bread which I will give for the liveness of the world is my flesh (Greek sarx). 52The Jews therefore contended with one a nonher, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat? I am the brio bread which came down out of heaven (v. 51a). This living bread parallels the living water that Jesus offered the Samaritan woman (410). If anyone eats (phage) o f this bread, he will live forever (v. 51b). Phage is the aorist of esthio (to eat), and thus represents a one-time action. To eat of this bread, in this context, means the once-and-for-all action of accepting or believe in Christ. Yes, the bread which I will give for the life of the world is my flesh (Greek sarx)(v. 51c). Jesus does not retreat from the offense of his words, but instead adds to it with his mention of flesh (sarx). This is sacrificial language. The Torah requires ritual sacrifice of animals, and specifies how they are to be prepared and how their flesh is to be used. Some flesh is to be burned on the communion table and other flesh is to be eaten. Jesus makes his sacrifice in behalf of the world not just Israel (see overly 316-17). The Jews therefore contended with one another, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat? (v. 52). figure of speech is a provocative word, raising the specter of cannibalism. No observant Jew would consider eating human flesh. VERSE 53 UNLESS YOU EAT AND DRINK 53Jesus therefore said to them, Most certainly I tell you, unless you eat (Greek phagete) the flesh (Greek sarka from sarx)of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you dont have life in yourselves. Most certainly I tell you (v. 53a). These words make emphatic that which follows. unless you eat (phagete)the flesh(sarka from sarx) of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you dont have life in yourselves (v. 53b). The title that Jesus uses for himself here is Son of Man, which is a less provocative title than Messiah. The first significant issue here is whether Jesus words are Eucharistic in nature (referring to the Lords Supper) or barely incarnational/sacrificial (referring to the incarnation and the cross). The question is significant. Is Jesus emphasizing participation in the Eucharist here? Should a sermon based on this text emphasize participation in the Lords Supper? Scholars are divided on this question. My conclusion is that incarnational, sacr ificial, and Eucharistic emphases are intertwined in 651-58, and that the emphasis shifts to favor the Eucharistic at verse line 51c. If this is correct, it is appropriate, perhaps even important, to emphasize participation in the Lords Supper when preaching from this text. We should also note two things that were adventure at the time of the writing of this Gospel that might have influenced the author to emphasize the eating of Jesus flesh and the drinking of his blood